I don't get this, first the police then our so called Home Minister and to top it off even our sleepy Prime Minister has jumped on the band wagon demanding for Anwar Ibrahim's DNA!! I'm no expert but i've watched enough of the popular TV series CSI to say "What The Fuck!" is our our people in power trying to do?
DNA is unique to every individual and since the police should already have a sample fro 10 years ago then take it out and see if it matches if it does get him if it doesn't then drop it. Why all the charades about wanting a new sample. It don't make any fucking sense! Unless of course the sample from 10 years ago was fudged. In that case then the 2 jokers ie police chief and attorney general have a lot to answer for right?
It's really embarassing to read how our so called leaders from this half past six goverment conduct themselves, its as if everyone has something to hide and that this whole fiasco is just the prelude to some really heavy shit skeletons coming out of the closet.
Posts
2 comments:
this is a high profile case.therefore everyone wants to have their say.
about the DNA,yeah it seems like we're in a CSI series.haha.
the question is why he wouldnt budged from decision of giving his DNA?.he said that he afraid that they might fabricated his DNA but his DNA was used 10 years ago and still he found not guilty under the sodomy allegation.but now he refuses to give his DNA sample even to his personal doctor.
what does he want actually?
In the previous case, there was the issue of "mattress" in which it was eventually decided by the court that the prosecution's "evidence" was inadmissible. The defence (Anwar's lawyers) argued that the "evidence" was planted on the matress.
Likewise, in the ongoing investigation, and WITHOUT THE POLICE REPORT, why give DNA sample when it could be made to corroborate with the yet-to-be revealed POLICE REPORT ? There is also no MEDICAL REPORT so far.
CSI (whether fictional or real) cannot be conducted without the "C" in CSI. There is only the allegation at the present time.
Given the history of this drama, one can understand the hesitation shown.
Perhaps the accuser indulges in activities with both sexes. And if so, perhaps there are other parties involved ? Or maybe there are activities he enjoys with his fiance which includes certain "toys" ?
Are the CSI focussing on just one possibility or is there more than one possibility ?
Post a Comment